RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05329 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his spouse. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was being medically retired, he filled out the paperwork to convert over to the Post 9/11 GI Bill and to transfer all 36 months to his spouse. In Nov 12, he logged into the website to transfer his benefits and noticed that the transfer never took place. He is not sure if the error was due to his medical retirement and years of service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 23 Sep 10, the applicant was relieved from active duty, with a reason for separation of disability permanent. He retired on 24 Sep 10 after serving 9 years, 9 months, and 12 days on active duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT notes that the applicant did not provide adequate justification/documentation of an error or injustice. His record reflect that he received his pre- separation counseling on 12 Jul 10. The applicant indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members, that he did want counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. However, there is no record of the applicant applying for the benefit in the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) system. He did not inquire about their TEB until 13 Nov 12 to the Total Force Service Center through Right Now Technology (RNT). The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Upon finding out that he was going to be medically retired, he had a lot of decisions and sacrifices that he needed to make. He had every attention to remain on active duty and retire at 20 plus years; however, due to an unfortunate injury while on duty, his career was cut short. On his DD Form 2648, he had requested counseling on his education benefits and had every intention of filling out the appropriate paperwork needed to transfer his benefits to his spouse. He thought he had taken care of this requirement; however, when he logged into the GI Bill website, he realized that he had failed to complete the necessary paperwork, which he feels was due to all of the confusion with retirement and finding a new job to take care of his family. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that he did not receive the appropriate counseling as required by law and Department of Defense regulations. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05329 in Executive Session on 12 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Nov 12, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 19 Nov 12. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jan 13. Panel Chair